AND iw.PropertyName = 'SWIDTAG_Activation_Status' AND EXISTS (SELECT * from importedInstalledWMIEvidence iiw AND iw.PropertyName = 'SWIDTAG_Product_Title' AND ic.ExternalID = iiw.ExternalComputerID AND ic.ComplianceConnectionID = iiw.ComplianceConnectionID) AND iw.PropertyName = 'SWIDTAG_Product_Version' LEFT JOIN ImportedWMIEvidence iw on iw.ExternalEvidenceID = iiw.ExternalEvidenceID ![]() EXISTS (SELECT * from importedInstalledWMIEvidence iiw INNER JOIN ImportedWMIEvidence iwm WITH (NOLOCK) on iwm.ExternalEvidenceID = iiwm.ExternalEvidenceIDĪND iwm.ComplianceConnectionID = iiwm.ComplianceConnectionID LEFT JOIN ImportedInstalledWMIEvidence iiwm WITH (NOLOCK) on iiwm.ExternalComputerID = ic.ExternalIDĪND iiwm.ComplianceConnectionID = ic.ComplianceConnectionID SELECT ic.ComputerName, iwm.*, ic.ComplianceComputerID, ic.ExternalID FROM ImportedComputer ic WITH (NOLOCK) The issue is that you can't make WMI evidences clever (for instance 21.%.20%), unless inserting them in the database. So, you could theoretically ignore the add / remove evidence and add the WMI. You are right Acrobat reader as a common add / remove program evidence, but no WMI. Can you confirm this? I can verify this with other customers. You can run the query below (you can uncomment to get only the computers where 2021 Continuous Pro exists but performance is poor) and hopefully will see many records. Hello The agent collects WMI evidences, even if there are not mapped to applications by the ARL. The first test look encouraging on our side. ![]() I would prefer we use the existing WMI evidences collected from the SWIDTags than change the agent to collect a new registry entry (by the way, thanks for your investigation, I had found the IsAcrInstalledInRdrMode in the same node but the key you provide looks good!).ĭo you see the WMI patterns I show below. Our plan is to stop using the ambiguous add/remove program evidence from Acrobat DC, add it to Acrobat Reader, and enhance the WMI evidences we use for Acrobat DC (Created from the SWIDTags that have not been systematically managed in the last versions), with the patterns below. As with multiple versions, this is not supported and may disappear at any time.Indeed, having Acrobat Reader and writer sharing the same add / remove is just a pain. ![]() "C:\Program Files (x86)\Adobe\>MajorVersion<\Acrobat\Acrobat.exe" /nĭouble click on the short cut and you get a completely new, memory independent, copy of Acrobat. ![]() A much simpler way is to add a /n to the target line on a short cut's properties. If you are thinkinking of installing the second vesion in order to be able to have two PDFs launched at the same time - don't. That way you reap the benefits of the newer version's application integration, virtual printer, etc., but are still able to launch the older version as needed. Your best bet is to leave the older one installed (or install it first), then install the newer one. A t one point, I had four versions installed. I've run multiple versions of Acrobat within Windows for many, many versions. There are only two reasons that I can think of that you might want to have both installed - creating version upgrade documentation, and LCD.Īnyhow. Such as MS Office, virtual printer, browsers, etc. do not have the deep integration into other applications and OS functions that of Acrobat.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |